Zoot Alors!

Creepy teen book

Peck, Richard. (1977). Are you in the House Alone? New York: Viking Press. 160 pages.

Gail is a junior in high school and has a steady boyfriend who she is sexually active with. She was smart and proactive and went to Planned Parenthood to get birth control. Everything about Gail is pretty much average. Her looks, her grades, her friends; there is really no reason for anyone to pay much attention to her. Then she starts getting creepy phone calls at night while she's babysitting and receives an extremely violent and sexually explicit letter in her locker at school. Shaken, Gail finds herself with no where to turn and her best friend telling her to "forget it". Finally she makes an attempt at help by going to the guidance councilor at school. Just as she feared she isn't taken seriously. What makes this book both interesting and hard to take at the same time is the ending. Gail is attacked and raped while babysitting by her best friends very rich and boyfriend from a very affluent family. Her family are the only ones who believe her as the police take the side of the boy and his family. This is what irks me, NOTHING HAPPENS. It's implyed that the boy goes crazy and is committed but there are no charges pressed and there is no closure for Gail. She was a sexually active girl in her teens, it must have been her fault. She must have brought it upon herself. So infuriating!

Much along the lines of Judy Blume's Forever, Peck's Are you in the House Alone? is ground breaking for when it was written. Tackling the subject of teen sexuality in a frank and matter-of-fact manner, Peck chose to deal with the darker side and address the topic of rape in a time when women were still "asking for it" if they claimed they were raped. It amazes me that Peck chose to do this and risk incurring the wrath of the feminist movement of the time. I can see where they might have been offended at a man taking such liberties as to try and depict something a man could never experience. I'm just hypothesizing here, I could be totally off base. I think he did a fairly good job all in all.

It would be interesting to have students read this book now. The conversations that you could have with girls (and boys too!) on how this has changed, or not changed, since the book was written and how it makes them feel.

Craptastic ending!

Lowery, Lois. (1993). The Giver. New York: Bantam Books. 192 pages.

Jonah is growing up in a world where there is no war, no poverty, and everyone lives happy, simple, "beige" lives. Meh. All sexual urges and stirrings are cut off by medication as soon as they start in adolescence and marriages and children are prearranged. All for the greater good. Even your future career is chosen for you and at the age of twelve you begin your apprenticeship. This is where Jonah's neat, tidy package of a life starts to unravel. Skipped over in the ceremony naming the internships, Jonah is brought up on stage and named the new Receiver of Memory. This prudent society, with it's Elders and their rules, has deemed it appropriate to store all the memories of the society BEFORE the order was imposed in the mind of one person. One person knows the ups and downs of emotions, the joy of music and the pain of physical injury. Jonah will stop taking his medication restricting his basic urges and begin the process of taking the memories from The Giver.

I will freely admit to being sucked into the seeming utopia that Lowery creates. Everything is laid out for you in a very orderly, calm fashion, lulling you; like world she is creating. Soon, though it's hard to pinpoint exactly when, the feeling starts to creep to the forefront of your mind that something just not quite right. That feeling continues to grow and grow as you read. Unfortunately it is quickly squashed by a real pisser of an ending. IMO. I think they die. I don't think it sounds like anything else. To think they live doesn't really fit with the tone of the rest of the story. Someone told me that Jonah makes an appearance in the sequel to the book, Gathering Blue. I'm not sure I'm going to read the next two books in the series though.

This would be a great book for junior high. They (probably) have not read 1984 or Brave New World and may not have experienced a dystopian novel yet. The discussions you could have about the society portrayed in the book and it's "right or wrongness" would be a great classroom discussion. I'd book talk it in that way, advertising the "unbelievableness" of the society in the story and as an introduction to dystopia.

Tell me something I don't already know

What Be Your Nerd Type? Your Result: Literature Nerd   Does sitting by a nice cozy fire, with a cup of hot tea/chocolate, and a book you can read for hours even when your eyes grow red and dry and you look sort of scary sitting there with your insomniac appearance? Then you fit this category perfectly! You love the power of the written word and it's eloquence; and you may like to read/write poetry or novels. You contribute to the smart people of today's society, however you can probably be overly-critical of works. It's okay. I understand.
Social Nerd
Musician
Drama Nerd
Gamer/Computer Nerd
Artistic Nerd
Anime Nerd
Science/Math Nerd
What Be Your Nerd Type? Quiz Created on GoToQuiz

Holy Conspiracy Theory Paranoia Batman!

Doctorow, Cory. (2008). Little Brother. New York: Tor. 365 pages.

Disclaimer: I love Cory Doctorow.

I've been an rabid Boing Boing reader for a while now. So while I hadn't gotten around to reading any of Cory's other fiction, when I saw this I knew I had to read it pronto. I also need to preface this with saying that, yes, I am somewhat of a conspiracy theorist and do not trust the government as far as I can throw it.

That said, I loved Doctorow's book Little Brother. Being in the wrong place at the wrong time takes on a whole new meaning for Marcus and his friends when they are scooped up by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) after a terrorist attack and brought to a secret prison (read: Guantanamo-like). Had Marcus and his friends not been the hacker/computer types they may never have been given a second look, but because they were aware and knowledgeable of technology and their rights as US citizens they were targeted. After being released Marcus et al. realize their home of San Francisco has been turned into a police state where everyone is a suspected terrorist. Knowing that he will forever be watched and that no one will believe his story, Marcus decides the only thing to do is to take on the DHS himself. Creating a phenominal underground network of teen hackers (remember the movie Hackers with Angelina Jolie?!?) Marcus will teach you more about computer technology and security, as well as it's history, than you ever thought possible. For those who don't like the mini computer science lessons this book may not be for you. Those who are technilogically inclined or are eager to learn more about technology will love this book.

Now for the (few and far between) things that I did not like. I thought that the writing was choppy in places. It just didn't flow as nicely as it could have. Could be it just needed a little more time on the editors table... The only other thing that peeved me was the portrayl of Marcus' Dad. A librarian! It miffed me that he was so closed minded about everything. In real life Doctorow is a champion for libraries and librarians and spoke at the big ALA shin-dig this year. Besides those pretty trivial things I loved the book.

I would definitely booktalk this but only to a selective audience, it's not a book for everyone and I can appreciate that. The conspiracy theory and computer hacking aspects are great pull-ins for kids.

Twilight can just suck it

Westerfeld, Scott. (2005). Peeps: A Novel. New York: Razorbill. 312 pages.

Yeah, you heard me. I'll be the first to admit that I like vampire books that are filled with good, steamy sex. Twilight's okay for that. Peeps isn't exactly what you would call sexy (there's a sexual element to the plot but it isn't "sexy"), and that's probably why I liked it a little bit better than Twilight.

Westerfeld's main character Cal is a young lad from Texas who came to New York City to go to college. We can sort of plug in the typical happenings from there. Cal imbibes too much alcohol and gets seduced into a one night stand that he doesn't really remember the next day. Quite an exciting way to lose your virginity, no? Unfortunately we don't get any of the steamy details. The whole story is told in a very sterile and scientific manner, which really does fit the story nicely. After his little adventure Cal goes on as usual; going to classes, having girlfriends, until he notices things seem to be changing. His sense of smell and night vision are enhanced, his strength increased, and what's with those weird meat cravings all of a sudden? He's been infected with a parasite that causes vampirism. Luckily for Cal he's one of the few that remains a carrier and never reaches full blown vampire status. Now he has to retrace his steps and find every girl that he's ever slept with to try to contain the spread of the parasite. Kind of like an STD. Except this STD causes you to start eating people. Nice. Add in an ancient, secret city agency (think Men in Black but for NYC) and you've got quite a story.

At the same time that I liked this book there were definitely aspects that I had problems with, and these might just be my particular tastes and have no literary merit what-so-ever, but they bugged me nonetheless. It annoyed me that the history of what was going on with the virus was so disjointed and long in coming. And then I almost thought that the whole alternative plan/army building to fight the worms thing was kind of random.

If I were to booktalk this book I would use a sort of "Twilight for Sci-Fi fans" approach.